Google OpenClaw Ban: Save Your Account Now
Protect your Antigravity subscription: Dodge Google's OpenClaw bans now.
Feb 23, 2026 - Written by Lorenzo Pellegrini
This image is generated by Gemini
Lorenzo Pellegrini
Feb 23, 2026
Google Bans Paying Antigravity Subscribers Over OpenClaw Usage: What Developers Need to Know
Google has sparked outrage among developers by suspending paid Antigravity and Gemini AI Ultra subscribers caught using the open-source OpenClaw agent framework. This zero-tolerance crackdown targets accounts linked to suspicious activity, raising questions about AI tool policies and developer workflows.
What is OpenClaw and Why the Controversy?
OpenClaw is an open-source AI agent framework designed for coding tasks, allowing users to integrate it with various AI models via OAuth tokens. It promises efficient automation but has drawn scrutiny for potential security risks and policy violations when paired with premium services.
Google views the use of its Antigravity servers, a specialized AI coding assistant, to power third-party tools like OpenClaw as a breach of terms. Affected users receive abrupt Error 403 suspensions without warning, even for testing purposes, and appeals are routinely denied under a strict zero-tolerance policy.
Details of Google's Restrictions
Reports confirm that Google has restricted access to Antigravity, Gemini CLI, and Cloud Code Private API for users whose credentials appeared in OpenClaw integrations. Official responses emphasize that this constitutes unauthorized use of proprietary servers for non-Google products.
- Suspensions hit paying subscribers, blocking their full AI quotas.
- No reversals offered, despite comprehensive investigations by Google's teams.
- Triggers include OAuth token sharing with OpenClaw, even for legitimate development.
This ban wave has frustrated power users who rely on agentic workflows to maximize their paid subscriptions efficiently.
Industry Reactions and Comparisons
Developers argue that Google's approach punishes loyal customers while competitors take a more lenient stance. OpenAI and Anthropic do not ban Pro users for OpenClaw integration, and emerging players like Kimi and MiniMax promote compatibility to attract developers.
Anthropic recently updated its terms to ban OAuth tokens in external tools like OpenClaw, aligning somewhat with Google. Meanwhile, OpenAI hired OpenClaw's creator, Peter Steinberger, with CEO Sam Altman praising his role in advancing personal AI agents. Steinberger has hinted at dropping Google support amid the backlash.
Implications for Developers and the AI Ecosystem
Paying subscribers face a dilemma: stick to manual web interfaces or risk permanent bans when using modern CLI agents. Critics call for rate limiting (HTTP 429 errors) over outright suspensions to balance abuse prevention with user needs.
- Drives developers to competitor ecosystems embracing agent tools.
- Highlights tensions between open-source innovation and proprietary AI protections.
- Security concerns persist, as OpenClaw's framework raises risks around credential handling.
Conclusion
Google's bans on OpenClaw users underscore the evolving rules governing AI agent usage in premium services. Developers must now navigate stricter policies to avoid losing access to powerful tools like Antigravity.
As the industry shifts toward agentic AI, expect more debates on balancing openness with security. Stay informed on terms of service updates to protect your subscriptions and workflows.
Google's heavy-handed suspension of paying Antigravity and Gemini AI Ultra subscribers over OpenClaw usage reveals a fundamental tension at the heart of the modern AI ecosystem: proprietary platforms are struggling to reconcile the explosive growth of open-source agentic tooling with their need to protect infrastructure, enforce terms of service, and prevent unauthorized API arbitrage, and in doing so, they risk alienating the very power users who drive adoption and revenue. What's particularly striking is the asymmetry in consequences: developers investing in premium subscriptions to maximize their legitimate workflows are being permanently banned without recourse, while the broader industry, including Anthropic and OpenAI, is still actively debating where exactly the line sits between "creative tool integration" and "terms violation," as evidenced by Anthropic quietly updating its own OAuth policies and OpenAI simultaneously hiring OpenClaw's creator and signaling strategic alignment with the agentic paradigm. This isn't just a Google PR misstep; it's a preview of the regulatory and policy arms race that every major AI provider will face as CLI agents, OAuth-based integrations, and multi-model orchestration become standard developer workflows, and it strongly suggests that the platforms who win the next wave of developer loyalty will be those who respond to agentic usage with intelligent rate limiting and transparent policy frameworks, not blunt zero-tolerance bans that punish curiosity and innovation. 🚀